<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Slacy's Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://slacy.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://slacy.com/blog</link>
	<description>This site is solar powered!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Download Palm Pre WebOS sound effects and ringtones by Joe</title>
		<link>http://slacy.com/blog/2010/02/download-palm-pre-webos-sound-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-20782</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slacy.com/blog/?p=1121#comment-20782</guid>
		<description>Thanks! I loved my Pre but had to move on to an android, but still like to reminisce every so often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! I loved my Pre but had to move on to an android, but still like to reminisce every so often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Goodbye, cruel Wallaby 3 phototherapy blanket (i.e. &#8220;Billi Blanket&#8221;) by Al</title>
		<link>http://slacy.com/blog/2007/06/goodbye-cruel-wallaby-3-phototherapy-blanket-ie-billi-blanket/comment-page-1/#comment-20780</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slacy.com/blog/index.php/2007/06/04/goodbye-cruel-wallaby-3-phototherapy-blanket-ie-billi-blanket/#comment-20780</guid>
		<description>First off if ANYONE has any question on how to use, simply visit:
http://global.respironics.com/UserGuides/UserGuideWallaby3Parents.pdf

Secondly: Nearly every &quot;point&quot; you made to Respironics has nothing to do with respironics. The provider (apria) should have given you either a pamplet, printout or at least directed you to the site above. 
Light penetrates the paper and would not penetrate the cloth.
Your provider has an option to buy a longer cord, again your providers decision.  
Make the cord easier to reatach? Think of the power consumption of this unit... from one engineer to another, do some research. Also, there are strict laws in this area. 
Research on users? I don&#039;t think you understand what is happening, why or even how. I think you are giving Respironics the blame while it belongs to apria. Well put Nurse Heather.  Happy your baby is safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off if ANYONE has any question on how to use, simply visit:<br />
<a href="http://global.respironics.com/UserGuides/UserGuideWallaby3Parents.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://global.respironics.com/UserGuides/UserGuideWallaby3Parents.pdf</a></p>
<p>Secondly: Nearly every &#8220;point&#8221; you made to Respironics has nothing to do with respironics. The provider (apria) should have given you either a pamplet, printout or at least directed you to the site above.<br />
Light penetrates the paper and would not penetrate the cloth.<br />
Your provider has an option to buy a longer cord, again your providers decision.<br />
Make the cord easier to reatach? Think of the power consumption of this unit&#8230; from one engineer to another, do some research. Also, there are strict laws in this area.<br />
Research on users? I don&#8217;t think you understand what is happening, why or even how. I think you are giving Respironics the blame while it belongs to apria. Well put Nurse Heather.  Happy your baby is safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Python Multi-dimensional dicts using defaultdict by stephen</title>
		<link>http://slacy.com/blog/2010/05/python-multi-dimensional-dicts-using-defaultdict/comment-page-1/#comment-20775</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slacy.com/blog/?p=1185#comment-20775</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t recursively call the dictionary but the link below contains a nice explanation.

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2388302/best-way-to-define-multidimensional-dictionaries-in-python</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t recursively call the dictionary but the link below contains a nice explanation.</p>
<p><a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2388302/best-way-to-define-multidimensional-dictionaries-in-python" rel="nofollow">http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2388302/best-way-to-define-multidimensional-dictionaries-in-python</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cloud storage predictions. by Josiah C.</title>
		<link>http://slacy.com/blog/2012/01/cloud-storage-predictions/comment-page-1/#comment-20757</link>
		<dc:creator>Josiah C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slacy.com/blog/?p=1646#comment-20757</guid>
		<description>In the fall of 1998 (a little over 13 years ago) I built a machine for a friend of mine for college. It was 333mhz, had 64 megs of ram, and had a 4 gig hard drive. You could get bigger drives, more memory, and faster processors, but that was the best bang for the buck at the time. In the summer of 1997, a friend of mine bought a 200mhz machine, 32 megs of ram, with a 2 gig drive in it. You may be close on the mhz, but you are way over on the disk storage.

That said, I had a 56k modem in 1998. But my friend had 5 mbit cable modem. Now, 14 years later, Time Warner, Cox, Comcast, etc., are still more or less topping out at 20mbit in most areas, with 50mbit to select areas. AT&amp;T U-verse and Verizon FIOS top out at 50mbit. Here we are, 13 years later, and peak connection speeds are only 10x better than they were then.

Meanwhile, those 4 gig drives could do about 15-20 megs/second sequential transfer, 1-2 megs random. The best 3-4TB spinning drives now can do up to around 200 megs/second sequential transfer, *maybe* getting to 4-5 megs random (but only with large on-disk buffers, which risk data integrity issues on power failure). SSDs are a game changer because you can get 50-100 megs/second random and 150+ megs/second sequential transfers with sub-ms latencies (compared to ~10ms latencies with spinning disks). You get an enterprise PCI-Express SSD, and you start pushing 1 gig/second sequential, 500 megs/second random - with a single device.

If we assume that in 13 years network connection speeds will increase by 10x (unlikely with the way the cable/telephone companies have been dragging their heels, trying to claim that they are paupers despite huge profits), that will only be 500 mbit. Meanwhile, a single high-quality SSD today will beat the hell out of that network connection in terms of both throughput and latency. Because in the .1ms that an SSD can respond in, electricity can only travel 30km, which means that not only will you need multiple high-bandwidth connections to the mythical cloud, but you will also need to be within 15km of that cloud.

Local storage wins, and will keep winning for any &quot;home vs cloud&quot; solution. In the server world, that is different, but then we start talking about different orders of magnitude. Though, as Artur Bergman said: http://www.livestream.com/oreillyconfs/video?clipId=pla_3beec3a2-54f5-4a19-8aaf-35a839b6ecaa Just buy some SSDs and put it in a box. That&#039;s your answer to scaling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the fall of 1998 (a little over 13 years ago) I built a machine for a friend of mine for college. It was 333mhz, had 64 megs of ram, and had a 4 gig hard drive. You could get bigger drives, more memory, and faster processors, but that was the best bang for the buck at the time. In the summer of 1997, a friend of mine bought a 200mhz machine, 32 megs of ram, with a 2 gig drive in it. You may be close on the mhz, but you are way over on the disk storage.</p>
<p>That said, I had a 56k modem in 1998. But my friend had 5 mbit cable modem. Now, 14 years later, Time Warner, Cox, Comcast, etc., are still more or less topping out at 20mbit in most areas, with 50mbit to select areas. AT&amp;T U-verse and Verizon FIOS top out at 50mbit. Here we are, 13 years later, and peak connection speeds are only 10x better than they were then.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, those 4 gig drives could do about 15-20 megs/second sequential transfer, 1-2 megs random. The best 3-4TB spinning drives now can do up to around 200 megs/second sequential transfer, *maybe* getting to 4-5 megs random (but only with large on-disk buffers, which risk data integrity issues on power failure). SSDs are a game changer because you can get 50-100 megs/second random and 150+ megs/second sequential transfers with sub-ms latencies (compared to ~10ms latencies with spinning disks). You get an enterprise PCI-Express SSD, and you start pushing 1 gig/second sequential, 500 megs/second random &#8211; with a single device.</p>
<p>If we assume that in 13 years network connection speeds will increase by 10x (unlikely with the way the cable/telephone companies have been dragging their heels, trying to claim that they are paupers despite huge profits), that will only be 500 mbit. Meanwhile, a single high-quality SSD today will beat the hell out of that network connection in terms of both throughput and latency. Because in the .1ms that an SSD can respond in, electricity can only travel 30km, which means that not only will you need multiple high-bandwidth connections to the mythical cloud, but you will also need to be within 15km of that cloud.</p>
<p>Local storage wins, and will keep winning for any &#8220;home vs cloud&#8221; solution. In the server world, that is different, but then we start talking about different orders of magnitude. Though, as Artur Bergman said: <a href="http://www.livestream.com/oreillyconfs/video?clipId=pla_3beec3a2-54f5-4a19-8aaf-35a839b6ecaa" rel="nofollow">http://www.livestream.com/oreillyconfs/video?clipId=pla_3beec3a2-54f5-4a19-8aaf-35a839b6ecaa</a> Just buy some SSDs and put it in a box. That&#8217;s your answer to scaling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If you care about search quality, then delete your Google+ account. by Davis Freeberg</title>
		<link>http://slacy.com/blog/2012/01/if-you-care-about-search-quality-then-delete-your-google-account/comment-page-1/#comment-20742</link>
		<dc:creator>Davis Freeberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slacy.com/blog/?p=1644#comment-20742</guid>
		<description>I deleted mine, but it didn&#039;t do any good.  Google still recommends their new search to me no matter how many times I tell them to quit.  The most frustrating part is that they are including &quot;personalized&quot; results from people who I can&#039;t &quot;unfriend&quot; now, so if you don&#039;t delete your spammy friends before deleting your account, then Google will permanently use the information from your old account if you log into any of their other services and then try to search.  Not a big deal I suppose if you&#039;re careful to only follow family, but it seems stupid for them to make the search results worse for those of us who&#039;ve expressly told them we want to opt out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I deleted mine, but it didn&#8217;t do any good.  Google still recommends their new search to me no matter how many times I tell them to quit.  The most frustrating part is that they are including &#8220;personalized&#8221; results from people who I can&#8217;t &#8220;unfriend&#8221; now, so if you don&#8217;t delete your spammy friends before deleting your account, then Google will permanently use the information from your old account if you log into any of their other services and then try to search.  Not a big deal I suppose if you&#8217;re careful to only follow family, but it seems stupid for them to make the search results worse for those of us who&#8217;ve expressly told them we want to opt out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Download Palm Pre WebOS sound effects and ringtones by Rob</title>
		<link>http://slacy.com/blog/2010/02/download-palm-pre-webos-sound-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-20740</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 23:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slacy.com/blog/?p=1121#comment-20740</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for these webOS sound files.  I didn&#039;t know where to find them on the phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for these webOS sound files.  I didn&#8217;t know where to find them on the phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Python: Unable to find vcvarsall.bat by fmiawenhra</title>
		<link>http://slacy.com/blog/2010/09/python-unable-to-find-vcvarsall-bat/comment-page-1/#comment-20738</link>
		<dc:creator>fmiawenhra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 08:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slacy.com/blog/?p=1348#comment-20738</guid>
		<description>Outdated link: The /express/Downloads link goes to the download page of the most recent version of Microsoft Visual Studio, which is no longer the 2o08 version. The Visual Studio 2008 downloads are available at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/visualstudio/en-us/products/2008-editions/express&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/visualstudio/en-us/products/2008-editions/express&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outdated link: The /express/Downloads link goes to the download page of the most recent version of Microsoft Visual Studio, which is no longer the 2o08 version. The Visual Studio 2008 downloads are available at <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/visualstudio/en-us/products/2008-editions/express" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/visualstudio/en-us/products/2008-editions/express</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Python: Unable to find vcvarsall.bat by john</title>
		<link>http://slacy.com/blog/2010/09/python-unable-to-find-vcvarsall-bat/comment-page-1/#comment-20727</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 11:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slacy.com/blog/?p=1348#comment-20727</guid>
		<description>This should work: http://blog.eddsn.com/2010/05/unable-to-find-vcvarsall-bat/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should work: <a href="http://blog.eddsn.com/2010/05/unable-to-find-vcvarsall-bat/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.eddsn.com/2010/05/unable-to-find-vcvarsall-bat/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I&#8217;m unhappy with the Pyramid web framework. by Sepero</title>
		<link>http://slacy.com/blog/2011/02/why-im-unhappy-with-the-pyramid-web-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-20720</link>
		<dc:creator>Sepero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 17:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slacy.com/blog/?p=1490#comment-20720</guid>
		<description>Pyramid Team, I love you guys, but I hope you read #4 on Slacy&#039;s list very well.

Defaults, Defaults, Defaults! (IMHO preferably chosen by the Pyramid devs, rather then the community at large)
Get defaults for everything. And make them known. If a user desires another choice, they assuredly will make it happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pyramid Team, I love you guys, but I hope you read #4 on Slacy&#8217;s list very well.</p>
<p>Defaults, Defaults, Defaults! (IMHO preferably chosen by the Pyramid devs, rather then the community at large)<br />
Get defaults for everything. And make them known. If a user desires another choice, they assuredly will make it happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pitfalls of Python&#8217;s &#8216;is&#8217; operator by Little Python Gotcha &#124; Daven Quinn</title>
		<link>http://slacy.com/blog/2010/08/pitfalls-of-pythons-is-operator/comment-page-1/#comment-20710</link>
		<dc:creator>Little Python Gotcha &#124; Daven Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 03:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slacy.com/blog/?p=1317#comment-20710</guid>
		<description>[...] New baby-Python-programmer discovery: Never use the &#8220;is&#8221; operator! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New baby-Python-programmer discovery: Never use the &#8220;is&#8221; operator! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

